@article{oai:hirogaku-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000555,
 author = {齋藤, 章吾},
 journal = {紀要},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {Article, This paper proposes that Copy Deletion should apply representationally and demonstrates that Fox and Pesetsky’s (2005) (F&P) cyclic linearization is unviable under the copy theory of movement. First, I introduce Copy Deletion and explain its trigger. Then, I demonstrate that this operation cannot be applied phase-by-phase by utilizing the data with in-situ wh. What is crucial is that the computational system cannot know which copy should be (un)realized at a phase. This discussion leads to a consequence that F&P’s cyclic linearization cannot hold under the copy theory of movement because two copies cause a linearization contradiction, and Copy Deletion cannot solve this problem.},
 pages = {7--14},
 title = {（Non-）Cyclicity of Copy Deletion},
 volume = {57},
 year = {2021}
}